What are its roots?
The 421-a tax abatement program began as a way to stop the waning residential construction as families moved to the suburbs. The program made new housing construction in New York City eligible for a partial tax exemption for up to 10-25 years and hugely enabled the building of low-income housing. But, over the years, the 421-a became a very controversial program.
The case for and against it
The argument against the 421-a program is that it costs the city too much money and does not contribute nearly as many affordable housing units as originally intended, despite the multimillion dollar tax breaks given to developers who take part in the program. The City of New York’s Annual Report on Tax Expenditures estimates that over $1.1 billion of taxable income was not collected due to this program. And yet, according to a 2015 study by the Association for Neighborhood Housing and Development, “in fiscal year 2013-14 the program covered a total of 152,402 residential units, and granted $1.1 billion in tax abatements. But, only 12,748 of those units had affordability restrictions.” That means only 8 percent of units built under the abatement were affordable. And as an example of luxury buildings exploiting this program, in 2015, Politico reported the luxury highrise One57 saved almost $10 million in taxes due to the 421-a.
421-a as a financial tool
Developers clarify that it is easier to defray costs in condominium buildings but virtually impossible to build any future affordable rental units without 421-a. Susi Yu, Executive Vice President of Development at Forest City Ratner, says, “the expiration of 421-a put the kibosh on new buildings going into development. Without 421-a, it’s impossible to make rental projects economically feasible.”